There’s been a lot of noise recently about governments wanting to block or restrict Grok, supposedly because it can generate adult content. On the surface, that sounds reasonable. Protect users, protect minors, keep things “safe.” Fine. No one is arguing against sensible safeguards.
But here’s where it starts to feel a bit kinda off.
Grok isn’t the only AI that can produce adult content. Not even close. Plenty of AI tools text based, image based, and everything in between have the same capabilities, and many of them are far more widely used. They’re creating Only Fans content they’re so powerful!
Yet somehow, Grok is the one being singled out. So the question has to be asked if adult content is the real issue, why isn’t the same energy being applied across the board?
That inconsistency makes it hard to believe this is purely about protecting people.
Grok is tightly integrated with X, a platform that has become one of the last major spaces where messy, uncomfortable, and often unpopular opinions can still circulate freely.
That freedom makes people nervous especially those in power. Unlike heavily curated platforms, X doesn’t always smooth the edges or decide what’s acceptable thought in advance. And Grok, by design, reflects that same ethos less filtered, more responsive, more real-time.
So when governments talk about blocking Grok, it starts to feel less like a moral stand against adult content and more like a convenient lever. Adult content becomes the headline excuse, while the underlying discomfort may actually be about something else entirely, loss of narrative control.
Let’s be honest if adult content were the true concern, there would be clear, consistent regulations applied to all AI tools. There would be transparent standards, enforced equally. Instead, what we’re seeing looks selective. And selective enforcement is rarely about safety, it’s about power.
Free speech has never been neat or comfortable. It’s loud, chaotic, and sometimes offensive. But the moment we start deciding which tools are allowed to exist based on who owns them or what conversations they enable, we’re no longer talking about protection, we’re talking about censorship by proxy.
That doesn’t mean AI should be unregulated. Of course not. Safeguards matter. Age controls matter. Accountability matters. But regulation should be honest about its intent. If the goal is to limit adult content, say so and apply it universally. If the real concern is the influence of a platform that doesn’t toe the line, then we should at least have the courage to have that conversation openly.
Because once you start blocking tools under the guise of morality, it becomes very easy to quietly block ideas next.
And history tells us that never ends well
I may just go lick an ice cream in the meantime and watch where this all goes. Live in my pretend lifestyle where dare I say it none of this exists? Though we all know it does in another format.
CREDITS
Mady Pink dress from Saschas Designs at the Designer Showcase
Reema EVOX head from CATWA
Galvez hair from DOUX
Kait skin from the Skinnery in Sorbet
Luna body skin from the Skinnery
Classic mesh body from Legacy
Hacienda backdrop from Minimal
New York pose from Fashiiowl
Isabelle Cheren 